Some of his analysis is very off and his approach is dangerous – it
could destabilize a system that really needs very few changes. I also
think his attitude is very unpleasant. He is underinformed by reason
and in his skills and overinformed by a sense of superiority and an
inability to access his own intellect.
Michael Shuman’s book is far superior as is Elizabeth U’s. Other
people have talked about negative interest rates in a way that is much
more convincing. Occupy Money is a good book. He’s the kind of guy
who’s easy to market but people should stay away from his work and
stick with more middle of the road, for-profit people because their
methods will work. All of these books are much more empowering.
I frankly am not interested in giving! I’m not interested in getting, either.
I’m interested in compensation for work. Bartering and gifting are not going
to work better than working for money. The issue is that we have
inefficient distribution and poor training, systemically.
Not that we don’t appreciate each other.
I also should clarify: I was including the Quebec Convergence in my
post as they were actually charging me to attend. So I don’t need more
appreciation rather than just some sensible compensation. I could pay
money and receive appreciation, which happens all the time and is a
symptom of our reactionary attitudes towards money, authority, our
parents, and our own potential for success.
The last thing we need is to be more touchy-feely – I say that with love. The kind of love that is balanced and leads to a stable future. I also do not want more intimacy in my transactions. It creeps me out.
We created this kind of economy and are already getting what we already wanted. If you talk to people, they want money. Intimacy without money is taking advantage of people. Paying people fairly is intimate.
Eisenstein’s ideas are attractive to college educated people who would
experience bartering as a novelty. Few of such people have ever been
hungry nor experienced instability otherwise. It seems like a fun little
game until it falls apart. I would prefer to use my standing in a way that
creates a civilization that really works, rather than regress because I
don’t see the valuable in being comfortable.